Friday, August 23, 2013

Corporate Personhood – A Christian Perspective



Corporate Personhood – A Christian Perspective
June 02, 2013
What kind of Being...is the Corporation?
[Shortened link to this article:
The Corporation is the most powerful institution in the world today. Its power dwarfs most nation-states, and with the advent of the World Trade Organization and its protocols, Corporations now effectively wield the power to overrule the laws and regulations of every country that joins the WTO. 
The values and viewpoints promoted by corporate advertising are presented and influence the inner lives of human beings in ways once considered the province of religion and philosophy. If we believe that Christianity has a role to play in shaping the future of humanity, it is crucial that we gain a deeper understanding of the Corporation, its rise to power, and its future plans for the human family.
This question of how to deal with the effects of corporate power over the affairs of human beings and our planet is one of deep concern to people worldwide. Here in the United States we are in a unique position to affect the outcome of this issue.
Corporations and the Rule of Law
Corporations in the United States increasingly have been granted the rights of human beings. The process began in the early 19th century, but accelerated after the Civil War, when the 14th, 15th and 16th Amendments, passed to insure the rights of newly liberated slaves, were applied to corporations. These corporations were held to be “legal persons” as opposed to “natural persons,” but to have the same rights. And these rulings were affirmed by judges in courts up to and including the Supreme Court.
The pernicious effects of these rulings has become obvious, as corporations spread their power and influence over our cultural and political institutions, using these rights of free speech and equal protection to increase their power while eroding the rights of the human beings whom they supposedly serve.
Now, in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision lifting constraints on the Free Speech Rights of Corporate Persons, these issues have entered the forefront of attention for concerned human persons in our country. Many of us are upset by the ruling, and feel that it is cause for grave concern. We are correct in that concern, but what is it about this ruling that is so disturbing from a Christian perspective? Or, to put it in a different way,
how can we, as Christians, understand the deeper aspects of what it means to treat an economic entity as a human being?
Let’s start with the question of what makes us human.
What Makes Us Human?
For many philosophers, both spiritual and temporal, the human is the unique being who can say “I” to him or herself. That is, we recognize our own individuality, as a being standing alone in the world, even as we share our world with other humans, the kingdoms of nature and the spiritual forces of the cosmos. This quality of self-consciousness, whether seen as an attribute of being alive or as a manifestation of the immortal divine spirit within, is the starting point of what makes us human.
If we look at human development throughout history, we see the experience of the ego (another word for the “I”), has not been static through the ages. In ancient civilizations people felt deeply embedded in tribe, family or nation, with what we today would see as an “undeveloped” sense of themselves as individuals. Arranged marriages, to give just one example, were completely accepted at one time, whereas today we are shocked by such practices in the U.S.
This development of the ego has both positive and negative aspects for us as individuals. We become freer, yet we also become more isolated from one another. We have the possibility of self development, but also of becoming more selfish and less involved with the fate of our fellow human beings.
In the midst of this process of human development, we are presented with the Event of Christ’s Appearance on the Earth. This Divine, Spiritual Being, who fully and freely incarnates into Human Existence, goes through Death and Resurrection, and becomes One with Humanity and the Earth itself.
And so, now, a new possibility for the human Ego emerges; the possibility of recognizing “Not I, but Christ in Me.” This is a possibility, not of the annihilation of Self, but of recognizing the existence of a higher, even a more human self that lives within each of us, and which can be experienced as the new, more spiritually developed human being made possible through the connection to the being of The Christ. The recognition that the Christ lives in each human being (regardless of their outward religious preference, ethnicity, gender, etc), is a bedrock Christian principle, and becomes the foundation for viewing human interaction and affairs in our social and economic world. It becomes possible for us, as free, independent human beings, to strive to become one with this higher being within us, and, in so doing, to evolve into the “Christ in Me”.
From this perspective, then, we can say that every human person is connected to, or even incarnates, the spiritual Being we know as Christ. And we can also say that the development of freedom, both on an inner and an outer level, is absolutely crucial to the emergence of this “Christ in Me.” Indeed, from a spiritual perspective, the emergence of this new Being is the goal of human evolution.
What Being is the Corporation?
Let us turn, then, to the “person” called the Corporation. What Spiritual Being can we say this person incarnates, or is connected to?
Over the past decade there have been a number of cases (such as the Ford Pinto and Firestone Tire) in which corporations have been shown, through internal documents, to be aware of product defects that resulted in injury or death to human beings. In all these cases, a decision was made that it was less costly to pay claims brought against the company than to correct the defects in the products, and so the companies continued to cover up the fact that their products were killing people. Human life, in other words, became an “item” in these corporate budgets, to be weighed against other cost considerations with an impact on the bottom line.  What kind of Being views human life in these terms?
Pharmaceutical companies routinely rush drugs to market with inadequate testing, and suppress evidence of their harmful side effects. Between 2000-2003, these companies paid out a total of $2.2 billion in fines and settlements, and four companies pled guilty to criminal charges (see The Truth about the Drug Companies, by Marica Angell, the former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine). What kind of Being sacrifices human health in pursuit of profit?
In the same way, human labor is also reduced to an item in a budget. Jobs are outsourced and offshored, and we recognize a “race to the bottom,” in wages and benefits, that now takes place on a global scale. Community is pitted against community, and even country against country, as the lowest in wages and environmental standards is relentlessly pursued by huge Global corporations. Again we must ask ourselves: What kind of Being divides human beings one from another in this way?
This type of behavior is not what we might expect from a friendly being. If this were a human being acting in this manner, we would characterize them as “heartless”. And, in fact, this is exactly what the corporate being is.
Corporations live on information and money. They develop and drive the development of faster and more sophisticated computer technology and information processing systems. This “feeds their heads”, enabling them to process more and more information about everything they need to know to work their will. And money is the vehicle though which that will is exercised. Where is the corporate heart? Corporate philanthropy is inextricably tied to public relations and the burnishing of the corporate image. Occasionally, a human being within the corporate system is able to harness resources to do good works, but this is rare and certainly not within the mission of the corporation, which, by law and custom, is strictly tied to the generation of profit and the accumulation of power and influence.
When we describe human beings who have strongly developed intellects and wills, but act in a “heartless” manner, the technical term often used to describe them is “sociopath”.  This is, in a very real sense, a descriptor which absolutely fits the “normal” corporation and the way it interacts with the world. When the most powerful institutions in our world are sociopaths, it is not surprising that we are in such a precarious position as a planet and as a human family.
The Corporation and Human Freedom
In the context of the evolution of humanity, however, it is the relationship of the Corporate Being to the furtherance of human freedom that is most important.
Here in the United States, we seem to have a great deal of outer freedom. We are aware of the real limitations imposed by economic class, by ethnicity, gender and even sexual orientation. Still, compared to other societies, and in our own estimation, we see ourselves as a “free people.” Indeed, our government often speaks of exporting this freedom to other lands—whether they want it or not!
For us, the deeper question is one of “inner freedom”.
What does this mean?
The two acknowledged masters of the “dystopian future” were George Orwell and Aldous Huxley. Their seminal works, 1984 and Brave New World, depicted futures without freedom. The first described a world controlled through media and mass propaganda leading to “thought control,” the other depicted similar (though softer) results through the use of drugs. Both men wrote only a half century ago, and both scenarios seem to be converging into a frightening present.
If we examine what is happening to childhood today, the situation is thrown into clear relief. It is not only that children are consuming more and more media at younger and younger ages, although that is bad enough. More fundamentally, this media is being used to consciously manipulate their thoughts, feelings and activities.  Children are being turned into little consumers and becoming “branded” for life. Books such as Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of Childhood, Kidnapped: How Irresponsible Marketers are Stealing the Minds of Your Children and Born to Buy: The Commercialized Child and the New Consumer Culture are just three of many books, articles and studies that document this phenomenon. As Susan Linn, psychologist and author of Consuming Kids, puts it: “Comparing the advertising of two or three decades ago to the commercialism that permeates our children’s world is like comparing a BB gun to a smart bomb. The explosion of marketing aimed at kids today is precisely targeted, refined by scientific method, and honed by child psychologists—in short, it is more pervasive and intrusive than ever before.”
The result is a constant, sophisticated and well financed assault on the inner life of our youngest and most vulnerable human beings. Children—even babies—have become a “target market” for those who control the means of mass communications.  If these giant corporations have their way, every “choice” our children have will be between Coke and Pepsi, between Nike and Adidas, or between valium and lithium. And, from Orwell’s perspective, his world will simply be the same, but upside down: Instead of the media constantly watching the people, the people will be constantly watching the media. The results, in terms of human freedom, will be more or less the same.
In this context, it is vital to differentiate between the human beings working within the corporate system and the “Being” that inhabits the Corporation. The humans are attuned to making a profit as the end product of their behavior. Even if they are selling empty calories to children, or affecting the body image of young people in ways that lead to bulimia and anorexia, or using sex and violence to sell toys, they are just doing their jobs and making a living. As people, they may have qualms about their work, but for the most part they see themselves as cogs in the economic system that sustains us all, and powerless to alter the process.
The motive of the Corporate Being is quite different. It is interested in debasing and controlling human beings, at blinding us to our potential to actualize the Christ within us. Corporate advertising is aimed at the lowest aspect of the human ego, the part that increases selfishness and separates us from the fate of others. The Corporation is, in a very real sense, the most important way that the “Anti-Christ” works in our world today. 
Helping the Human Miracle Occur
Under these conditions, how can our children ever meet and recognize the Christ within them? Miraculously, many do. Still, in the modern age, it is up to us to help these miracles occur, not to passively acquiesce in the takeover of our progeny. We know that God helps those who help themselves. In the face of this huge, powerful and, finally, anti-human Being, how can we help ourselves, our children and our world?
It is in the nature of Evil to overreach itself. It is never satisfied, but must continue to accumulate. While it may work behind the scenes with some subtlety for a time, its tendency to expose itself in its unrelenting quest is one of the areas of hope and opportunity for those working in the spirit of human progress. Today, we are presented with such a moment and such an opportunity.
The recent Supreme Court decision extending “corporate free speech” into the realm of direct political contributions has brought the issue of “corporate personhood” into public consciousness in an unparalleled way. There has been, for many years, a small movement devoted to exposing the dangers of this doctrine and proposing a variety of solutions to mitigating, if not ending, the influence of corporations on our government and cultural institutions. For most people, even those who are politically engaged, this effort seemed somewhat abstract, and lacked the immediacy associated with other political struggles (wars, climate change, etc). And yet, so many of these immediate issues are the result of unfettered corporate power, and changing this will open the possibilities for positive solutions to a wide variety of cultural, political, environmental and economic challenges facing humanity today.  
The effort can begin with conscious recognition that these corporations, whatever their spiritual and material composition, are not people and should not be considered people for any purpose.
Limiting Corporate Power
When corporations began, they were limited in many ways. They were limited in the scope of their operations (they were chartered for a specific, public purpose such as building a canal, road, etc), they were limited in their duration (when their purpose was accomplished, they were to be dissolved), and they were limited as to the financial liability of individual investors. Today, only this last limitation exists. They have become undying beings, able to act unchecked in the economic ream and dominate both politics and our cultural life. And the final limitation, that they existed to serve a specific social need, also has been lifted. The responsibility of the corporation today is to make money for its shareholders, and the collateral damage to human beings and our planet is an externalized cost to be borne by the entire society, not the corporation itself.
We need to return the corporation to its original form and social intention. To begin, we should work to redefine corporations as subordinate entities that may enjoy privileges granted by human beings, not rights. Perhaps the most important of these privileges to take back is that of free speech. It is through this right that corporations inundate us with advertising, buy politicians, influence elections, and exert a stranglehold on our media and all our communications. The curtailing of corporate free speech is not an attack on the concept of free speech in our society—it is an essential precursor to the reestablishment of human free speech.
When Oakhurst Dairy, a family-owned Maine business, used labels that stated they did not use artificial growth hormones, Monsanto Corporation sued them.  They claimed it was an unfair business practice because it implied the inferiority of products derived from cows fed artificial hormones. Oakhusrt backed down and diluted their statement. This is only one example among many of how corporations routinely seek to curtail criticisms of their products and practices by using their vast resources to sue humans who question their work. The attempt to impose “ag-gag” laws, making the obtaining and publishing of photos exposing conditions on factory farms is a stark illustration of the relationship between corporate “rights” to advertise and sell their products as safe and healthful, and our right to know the truth about what we are being fed.
In a situation where resources can trump truth, both free speech and equality under the law for humans are clearly in danger. The Post-Civil War amendments, passed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves, have become a huge and mighty shield for corporations to hide behind as they work their will upon an increasingly powerless human population.
On a practical level, an effective tool would be a constitutional amendment clarifying the fact that the rights enumerated in the constitution apply strictly to natural persons, not artificial beings created by law.
Tactically, I believe this to be both worthwhile as a goal and valuable as a tool of education and organization:
  1. It is completely legal.
  2. It is absolutely non-violent.
  3. It can be worked for on a local, state and national level.
  4. It is simple to explain.
  5. It can unite many groups—social conservatives, economic activists, people concerned with the environment, people of faith, etc.
  6. It allows us to challenge politicians and political parties with a very simple question: Do you support the rights of human beings over the rights of corporations?
  7. Despite the “simplicity” of the question, it goes to the spiritual core of the issue: Do we work for the good of the developing human being, the bearer of the Christ within each of us, or do we acquiesce to the forces that seek to control, manipulate and exploit human beings on the physical, emotional and spiritual levels of our existence?  
An amendment to our constitution, as described above, would go a long way towards bringing corporations under control and allow us to build a free and humane future for ourselves and our children. I urge people of faith to examine this issue, and to join this effort in whatever way makes sense to you.
A coalition has been formed of groups interested in working on this constitutional amendment. Information on this coalition can be found at www.MoveToAmend.org, along with descriptions and contact information on local groups and activities. This is a unique opportunity to build bridges and work in a positive way with people from many communities, and a movement in which people of faith can play an important role.
Each day, the threads of corporate control weave tighter, and the threat to our planet, our freedom and our future looms larger. If we are to achieve our goal of incorporating the Christ within ourselves, and giving our children a chance to do the same, we must begin today. It is, in fact, our sacred duty as Christians and as human beings

No comments: