Motives don't matter

Motives don't matter??

The same aspect of his trial stressed by Tim DeChristopher reappeared in the court marshall of PFC Bradley Manning for turning over a huge collection of classified diplomatic and other cables to Wikileaks. If Tim's words remind us of post-Nazi excuse-making in Europe—"I was just following orders"—then perhaps a similar pattern of diminished moral responsibility is being cultivated here in the USA.

At TruthDig.com the highly experienced and respected foreign correspondent Chris Hedges describes ground rules set for the trial that seem completely at odds with the whole American experience. He writes: "The military trial of Bradley Manning is a judicial lynching. The government has effectively muzzled the defense team. The Army private first class is not permitted to argue that he had a moral and legal obligation under international law to make public the war crimes he uncovered. The documents that detail the crimes, torture and killing Manning revealed, because they are classified, have been barred from discussion in court, effectively removing the fundamental issue of war crimes from the trial. Manning is forbidden by the court to challenge the government's unverified assertion that he harmed national security. Lead defense attorney David E. Coombs said during pretrial proceedings that the judge's refusal to permit information on the lack of actual damage from the leaks would 'eliminate a viable defense, and cut defense off at the knees.' And this is what has happened." "Manning is also barred from presenting to the court his motives for giving the website WikiLeaks hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic cables, war logs from Afghanistan and Iraq, and videos. The issues of his motives and potentially harming national security can be raised only at the time of sentencing, but by then it will be too late."